Skip to content

The challenge

Institutional software is usually designed for the person who commissioned it rather than the clerk who will use it forty times a day. The difference only becomes visible during training, when it is expensive to fix.

The other failure is a set of well-made screens with no rules behind them: the eleventh screen gets drawn from scratch, and the interface stops agreeing with itself.

How we approach it

A1

Watch the work being done

Observation of the current task before anything is sketched.

A2

Design the hardest path first

The exception case, not the tidy demonstration flow.

A3

Build a system, not screens

Tokens and components, so the next screen is assembly.

A4

Test with the real users

Including those for whom this is their first such system.

How delivery runs

The same four phases, whatever we are building.

  1. 012–3 weeks

    Discovery

    We map your current process, users and constraints, then define scope in writing.

  2. 022–4 weeks

    Design

    Interface and data design, reviewed with the people who will use the system daily.

  3. 036 weeks+

    Build

    Delivery in two-week increments, each one testable, with progress visible throughout.

  4. 04Ongoing

    Launch & support

    Deployment, training and documentation, then optional support at a level you choose.

What you get

Research
What we observed, with the counts and the quotes behind it.
Flows
The task paths, including the exceptions staff actually hit.
Interface
Screens in the states they reach — empty, loading, error.
Design system
Tokens, components and usage rules, documented.
Accessibility
Contrast, focus order and keyboard paths specified in design.
Handover
Specifications an engineer who was not in the room can build from.

What changes

Designed for the user

The person doing the work, not the person buying.

Consistent by construction

A system means the next screen already matches.

Cheaper to roll out

A clear interface needs fewer hours of training.

Accessible from the start

Specified in design, not audited after a complaint.

Questions

About this work specifically.

General questions about scope, ownership and timelines are answered on the resources page.

Usually yes, and it is short. A few hours watching the task performed surfaces the workarounds nobody mentions in a requirements meeting — and those workarounds are generally the real requirements.

Yes. The research, the interface and the documented design system are a legitimate standalone deliverable. We hand them to your own engineers or to another vendor without conditions attached.

Tell us what you need built.

We reply within two working days with honest scope and next steps — including when we are not the right fit.